Difference between revisions of "Discussion2S16"
(Draft save. Incomplete.) |
(Filled in math part. Outlined Coding Tips.) |
||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
Why do we need the inverse? Good question! Think about moving the camera in the positive direction by 20. If we think about that camera as our reference point, to the camera it would seem that the other objects of the world are moving in the negative direction by 20, or in other words, the inverse direction of the camera's translation. Remember that we're applying these transformations to ''p'', our vertex, which is an object of the world. Hence, we need to apply the inverse transformation of the camera in our rasterization equation. | Why do we need the inverse? Good question! Think about moving the camera in the positive direction by 20. If we think about that camera as our reference point, to the camera it would seem that the other objects of the world are moving in the negative direction by 20, or in other words, the inverse direction of the camera's translation. Remember that we're applying these transformations to ''p'', our vertex, which is an object of the world. Hence, we need to apply the inverse transformation of the camera in our rasterization equation. | ||
− | So how do we create this matrix? Well, lets first see how we did it in OpenGL. | + | So how do we create this matrix? Well, lets first see how we did it in OpenGL. If you look at <tt>Window.cpp</tt>'s <code>Window::resize_callback</code> you'll find the line: |
− | + | ||
− | If you look at <tt>Window.cpp</tt>'s <code>Window::resize_callback</code> you'll find the line: | + | |
<pre> | <pre> | ||
+ | // Move camera back 20 units so that it looks at the origin (or else it's in the origin) | ||
glTranslatef(0, 0, -20); | glTranslatef(0, 0, -20); | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
Line 83: | Line 82: | ||
This is exactly the example I gave above. <code>glTranslatef</code> moves the objects of the world. So now we can imagine that our camera is actually in (0, 0, 20). We call this vector ''e'' for eye. The direction that the camera is facing is called ''d''. Usually this will be set to the origin (0, 0, 0). Finally, the camera needs to know where ''up'' is, to complete the three basis vectors of the space. This is in most cases a normal pointing towards positive Y: (0, 1, 0). Using these three vectors, we can actually consult the convenient <code>glm::lookAt</code> function. You can use this function like such: | This is exactly the example I gave above. <code>glTranslatef</code> moves the objects of the world. So now we can imagine that our camera is actually in (0, 0, 20). We call this vector ''e'' for eye. The direction that the camera is facing is called ''d''. Usually this will be set to the origin (0, 0, 0). Finally, the camera needs to know where ''up'' is, to complete the three basis vectors of the space. This is in most cases a normal pointing towards positive Y: (0, 1, 0). Using these three vectors, we can actually consult the convenient <code>glm::lookAt</code> function. You can use this function like such: | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
− | C_inverse = glm::lookAt(e, d, up); | + | glm::mat4 C_inverse = glm::lookAt(e, d, up); |
</pre> | </pre> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Consult the lecture if you want to know what creating this matrix manually looks like. It will be important to know! | ||
===Projection Space=== | ===Projection Space=== | ||
+ | Projection space is what the world looks like after we've applied some projection that warps the world into something closer to our human visual system. There are multiple possibilities for the projections we can use, but we're going to stick with perspective projection for most of 3d graphics in this class. Perspective projection makes our world look warped such that closer objects seem larger, and further objects seem smaller. | ||
+ | [[File:Perspective_transformation.png|200px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | So how is the perspective transformation constructed? Let's again look at how OpenGL does it. Look at <tt>Window.cpp</tt>'s <code>Window::resize_callback</code> and you'll find the line: | ||
+ | <pre> | ||
+ | // Set the perspective of the projection viewing frustum | ||
+ | gluPerspective(60.0, (double)width / (double)height, 1.0, 1000.0); | ||
+ | </pre> | ||
+ | |||
+ | This sets the FOV(field of view) to 60.0 degrees, aspect ratio to <code>width / height</code>, near plane to <code>1.0</code>, far plane to <code>1000.0</code>. Much like the inverse camera matrix, <code>glm</code> provides a convenient function for us to create an equivalent matrix: | ||
+ | <pre> | ||
+ | glm::mat4 P = glm::glm::perspective(glm::radians(60.0f), | ||
+ | (float) width / (float) height, | ||
+ | 1.0f, 1000.0f); | ||
+ | </pre> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Consult the lecture if you want to know what creating this matrix manually looks like. It will be important to know! | ||
===Image Space=== | ===Image Space=== | ||
+ | Finally, we're at the matrix that takes a 3d point and gives us 2d pixel coordinates! Almost there. | ||
+ | [[File:full_transformation.png|200px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is the one matrix that we have that <code>glm</code> won't conveniently create for us. So we'll have to directly create ourselves using the following formula: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:viewport_matrix.png|600px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | The end result of this is the final ''p'''. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:p_prime.png|100px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, this is not the end, as we need to normalize the ''x' ''and ''y' ''to find the actual pixel coordinates. Therefore, our pixel coordinates will be ''(x'/w', y'/w')''. | ||
==Some Coding Tips== | ==Some Coding Tips== | ||
+ | ===What is Column vs. Row Major?=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===How Are We Drawing the Pixels After Rasterization?=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Make Utility Functions=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===To New or Not To New=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Do Not Load Your OBJs every frame=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Avoiding Hair Ifs=== |
Revision as of 03:34, 6 April 2016
Contents |
Overview
Week 2 discussion recap (04/04/16)
Slides: download here
The Problem with Rasterization
For homework 1 part 4, we're going to be rasterizing 3D points manually, as opposed to relying on OpenGL for it. What is rasterization? It's the process of taking a 3D scene description, and converting it into 2D image coordinates so that we can draw it on screen.
Let's say that we have a vertex p in 3d space (2.5, 1.5, -1). In homogeneous coordinates, this will be represented as follows:
Now when we try to find out what the pixel coordinates for this point would be, we immediately run into two issues:
- Our screen is a 2d coordinate system, but our point is in 3d!
- Where on the screen would (2.5, 1.5, -1) even be?
In short, we have a mismatch in coordinate systems!
How to Solve the Problem
The full equation for transforming from the 3d world(technically what we call object space) to 2d pixel coordinates(image space) is described in homework 1 and reprinted below:
Let's break each of the components down here, starting from right to left.
Object Space
The original vertex p starts in object space. This is the coordinate system that is inherent to our object, in this case the vertex.
World Space
World space is the space we are in after our transformations have been applied to the object. This allows us to have multiple objects coexist, and share the same world. This is usually written as M for model.
By this point we actually already know how to do world space transformations! We've already done this in the previous parts of homework 1. When we were transforming—translating, scaling, orbiting—the cube, we were already changing from object space to world space. If you're not done with the transformation portion of the homework yet, look at the cube code below:
void Cube::spin(float deg) { this->angle += deg; if (this->angle > 360.0f || this->angle < -360.0f) this->angle = 0.0f; // This creates the matrix to rotate the cube this->toWorld = glm::rotate(glm::mat4(1.0f), this->angle / 180.0f * glm::pi<float>(), glm::vec3(0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f)); }
Notice how cube's spin—which you've all seen work— simply changes one member variable this->toWorld
at the end? The toWorld matrix is what we call our model matrix, and it is what takes us from object space to world space(hence the name toWorld
).
However, there is a problem, that we've purposefully left in, with how the spin method is modifying this->toWorld
here. Did you spot it when you were working on the parts before part 4 of homework 1?
Transformation Order
The order in which we apply our transformations to toWorld
matters! Before we dive in, know that unlike words, we read matrix multiplication order from right to left.
Take a look at the following two orders.
- Translation then Rotation
- First, note how the rotation matrix is on the right side, but the sequence of order here is rotation first, then translation second. This is because we read matrix multiplication order from right to left.
- Note how the resulting matrix looks very much like a simple concatenation of the rotation and translation matrices, and how this differs from the next order's resulting matrix.
- Rotation then Translation
- Again, note how the translation matrix is on the right side, but the sequence of order is read translation first, then rotation second.
- In the resulting matrix, the translation portion of the matrix(the 4th column) looks much more complicated then the ordering from above. This is because the translation is also affected by the rotation that happened after.
So which do you think is the more desirable order of multiplying things?
Camera Space
Camera Space describes how the world looks in relation to the camera, or said differently the world with the camera as the reference point. This is usually written as C for Camera. An important point to note is that we actually require the inverse of C.
Why do we need the inverse? Good question! Think about moving the camera in the positive direction by 20. If we think about that camera as our reference point, to the camera it would seem that the other objects of the world are moving in the negative direction by 20, or in other words, the inverse direction of the camera's translation. Remember that we're applying these transformations to p, our vertex, which is an object of the world. Hence, we need to apply the inverse transformation of the camera in our rasterization equation.
So how do we create this matrix? Well, lets first see how we did it in OpenGL. If you look at Window.cpp's Window::resize_callback
you'll find the line:
// Move camera back 20 units so that it looks at the origin (or else it's in the origin) glTranslatef(0, 0, -20);
This is exactly the example I gave above. glTranslatef
moves the objects of the world. So now we can imagine that our camera is actually in (0, 0, 20). We call this vector e for eye. The direction that the camera is facing is called d. Usually this will be set to the origin (0, 0, 0). Finally, the camera needs to know where up is, to complete the three basis vectors of the space. This is in most cases a normal pointing towards positive Y: (0, 1, 0). Using these three vectors, we can actually consult the convenient glm::lookAt
function. You can use this function like such:
glm::mat4 C_inverse = glm::lookAt(e, d, up);
Consult the lecture if you want to know what creating this matrix manually looks like. It will be important to know!
Projection Space
Projection space is what the world looks like after we've applied some projection that warps the world into something closer to our human visual system. There are multiple possibilities for the projections we can use, but we're going to stick with perspective projection for most of 3d graphics in this class. Perspective projection makes our world look warped such that closer objects seem larger, and further objects seem smaller.
So how is the perspective transformation constructed? Let's again look at how OpenGL does it. Look at Window.cpp's Window::resize_callback
and you'll find the line:
// Set the perspective of the projection viewing frustum gluPerspective(60.0, (double)width / (double)height, 1.0, 1000.0);
This sets the FOV(field of view) to 60.0 degrees, aspect ratio to width / height
, near plane to 1.0
, far plane to 1000.0
. Much like the inverse camera matrix, glm
provides a convenient function for us to create an equivalent matrix:
glm::mat4 P = glm::glm::perspective(glm::radians(60.0f), (float) width / (float) height, 1.0f, 1000.0f);
Consult the lecture if you want to know what creating this matrix manually looks like. It will be important to know!
Image Space
Finally, we're at the matrix that takes a 3d point and gives us 2d pixel coordinates! Almost there.
This is the one matrix that we have that glm
won't conveniently create for us. So we'll have to directly create ourselves using the following formula:
The end result of this is the final p'.
However, this is not the end, as we need to normalize the x' and y' to find the actual pixel coordinates. Therefore, our pixel coordinates will be (x'/w', y'/w').