Difference between revisions of "Mipmapped Volume Rendering"

From Immersive Visualization Lab Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(TODO)
(TODO)
 
Line 7: Line 7:
 
==TODO==
 
==TODO==
  
1. check meshing error in the cave
+
* check meshing error in the cave
2. alpha blending
+
* alpha blending
3. image quality problem - preintegration?
+
* image quality problem - preintegration?
4. scaling
+
* scaling
5. 16 bit support
+
* 16 bit support
6. directory selection
+
* directory selection
7. performance check
+
* performance check
  
  

Latest revision as of 13:59, 27 October 2009

Contents

Current Project Status

  • meshing does not work correctly. check distance function and coordinate system
  • thin volume rendering: pressing texture
  • awful image quality..

TODO

  • check meshing error in the cave
  • alpha blending
  • image quality problem - preintegration?
  • scaling
  • 16 bit support
  • directory selection
  • performance check


Multi volume support

  • For now, it can load multiple volumes but the algorithm used here is very simple: overlaying two rendered images.
  • Chih's work hasn't been integrated. I also have an idea about the correct multi volume rendering equation.

Downsampler

  • Downsampler has lots of problems and I'd like to completely rewrite the program.
  • OpenGL API will accelerate this process.
  • Thin volume support

Renderer

  • Removing padding

Transfer Function

  • 1D transfer function

Optimization

  • 3D Texture compression?
  • Progressive refinement

Test Set

  • Collect a set of volume so I can always check after major modification of the code

Software Release

  • find an easy workflow minimizing editing
  • script
  • qmake

Tiled Display

  • works with CGLX but without any optimization
  • StarCAVE
  • Varrier

Long Term Goal

  • integrate with deskvox
  • integrate with my multi-dimensional transfer function