Difference between revisions of "CSE190W2013Paper"
(→Paper Presentation) |
(→Paper Presentation) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
This presentation accounts for 15% of your final grade. Each presenter will be graded on the following criteria: | This presentation accounts for 15% of your final grade. Each presenter will be graded on the following criteria: | ||
| − | * The quality of the presentation | + | * The quality of the presentation. |
| − | * The quality of the slides | + | * The quality of the slides. |
| − | * The presenter's comprehension of the paper | + | * The presenter's comprehension of the paper. |
Here are some general questions to help guide you when presenting a paper to the class: | Here are some general questions to help guide you when presenting a paper to the class: | ||
Revision as of 20:53, 29 January 2013
Paper Presentation
Each student must give a 15 minute presentation (+ 3 min. Q&A) on a full-length (8+ pages) paper of their choice from the field of 3D user interfaces. The paper must be at least from the year 2000, the more recent the better.
It is required that the presentation be accompanied by a slide presentation. The slide presentation can be done on your own laptop with a VGA output, or it can be emailed or given to the instructor on a USB thumb drive (Powerpoint or PDF format only).
This presentation accounts for 15% of your final grade. Each presenter will be graded on the following criteria:
- The quality of the presentation.
- The quality of the slides.
- The presenter's comprehension of the paper.
Here are some general questions to help guide you when presenting a paper to the class:
- What did the author(s) study? What issue about this topic were the author(s) trying to better understand?
- Why do we care about this topic?
- What methods did the author(s) use? Why are these methods suited to better understand the problem at hand?
- What are the main conclusions from this work?
Here are some general guidelines as to how to generate group discussion in the Q&A section:
- What part of the work was confusing to you?
- What parts were well explained and what parts were poorly explained?
- What type of previous studies is this work building on?
- What is the next step after this work?
- Are there other implications of this work that the authors haven’t considered?
Here is an incomplete list of qualifying conference proceedings. Note that in order to download the full PDF versions of the papers you will need to be logged in to UCSD's campus network.
